The logical-argumentative modalities in Italian language primary and lower secondary school geometry textbooks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33683/ddm.21.9.3

Keywords:

argumentation, mathematics textbooks, mathematical discourse, polygons, text linguistics

Abstract

This article analyses the logical-argumentative strategies contained in mathematics schoolbooks, focusing on geometry and, specifically, on polygons, considering the recursiveness of the topic in continuity between school orders. The investigation is strictly interdisciplinary between mathematics and linguistics, with particular attention for didactic, and is part of a larger ongoing research project. After some initial paragraphs devoted to describing the corpus and the text analysis criteria, we will move on to a historical-disciplinary framework of the topic, and then to the definition of the different logical-argumentative modes (linked to “doing”, “imagining” and “abstracting”); quantitative data about the distribution in the corpus will also be offered. Some possible teaching implications emerging from the analyses will be mentioned in the conclusions.

Published

2021-05-27

How to Cite

Sbaragli, S., Canducci, M., & Demartini, S. (2021). The logical-argumentative modalities in Italian language primary and lower secondary school geometry textbooks. Didattica Della Matematica. Dalla Ricerca Alle Pratiche d’aula, (9), 44 - 71. https://doi.org/10.33683/ddm.21.9.3

Issue

Section

Research and reflection

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>